Integration Results
All of us in our own practice to a greater or lesser extent rely on extraneous information, research published in journals or presented at scientific conferences. Allison Kanders spoke with conviction. Rare oncologist now applies only recommendations "elders" and circulars higher authorities. In our work, almost always there is room for creativity, albeit based on an analysis of the results of foreign studies. What have we pay attention to when analyzing the results presented? On the river on the number of patients in the study? The frequency of remission? On what really needs to pay attention, in order not to fall prey to strangers delusions or someone else's vanity? How not to harm the patient, taking the total truth, which, though published in reputable foreign journals, in time, as is clearly preliminary (and the author forgot or did not want this write)? Moreover, in a special turn of its own activities, many doctors come to the conclusion that the results of clinical studies conducted by others, for them it is not enough. And begin to meet. Let remember how we conducted our own detailed research, for example, for a dissertation or an article in the journal. The beginning of the study, for sure, put the visit the head office (Blades) to an international conference (Options: your visit to the conference, read by you or your supervisor papers in international journals). At this conference (in this magazine) was presented interesting for you (your boss) a detailed study, the results of which we would like to verify (confirm play) on your own experiment.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.